By SIOBHAN HUGHES and COREY BOLES
WASHINGTON -- Two Senate Democrats Wednesday unveiled climate legislation that aims to drastically cut greenhouse-gas emissions beginning in 2012, starting an effort that threatens to divide the party amid opposition from coal, manufacturing and oil interests.
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Barbara Boxer and Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry outlined the measure, which would cut emissions from 2005 levels 20% by 2020 and more than 80% by 2050.
"This bill addresses the major challenges of our generation," Ms. Boxer, of California, told the crowd of environmentalists on the East Lawn of the U.S. Capitol. She said the measure aims to address concerns in some regions that local economies would be harmed, and she said that "clean energy" would help create jobs.
President Barack Obama welcomed the legislative package, saying "we are one step closer to putting America in control of our energy future and making America more energy independent."
Democrats are hoping to act to combat global warming, which scientists have linked to more intense weather events such as drought in some places and rising sea levels in others. A small minority, including Sen. James Inhofe (R., Okla.), says there is no scientific evidence of such a threat.
Other Republicans took issue with the Boxer-Kerry bill, calling it a new national energy tax. "The last thing American families need right now is to be hit with a new energy tax every time they flip on a light switch, or fill up their car -- but that's exactly what this bill would do," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said in a statement.
In the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi called the legislation a "strong foundation" to work on, while Republican Leader John Boehner said the measure was a "dangerous proposal."
Utilities, which account for a big chunk of U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions, sent representatives out in a show of support. Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. Chairman Ralph Izzo showed up and through a statement said that the bill is "an important step in the right direction."
Associated Press
Sen. Barbara Boxer, seen in July, seeks to return the focus to climate change.
Among the energy sources that the Senate hopes to give an advantage to is natural gas. In an effort to reach Republicans, the goal is also to encourage nuclear power. And, in hopes of safeguarding against surges in costs for emitting carbon dioxide, the bill includes mechanisms to limit emission-allowance prices through a so-called soft collar.
One sign that efforts to reach other lawmakers may be paying off: softening opposition from some quarters. Asked about reports the Senate climate-change bill would reserve 20% to 25% of revenue raised to pay down the federal budget deficit, Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad (D., N.D.) said, "I like that a lot, I like that a lot."
Mr. Conrad wouldn't say whether that measure would be enough for him to set aside his skepticism over the legislation and support it, but he reiterated, "I would say that I like that piece."
The timing of climate-change legislation has been thrown into a state of flux by the continuing debate over an attempted overhaul of health-care policy. That effort is likely to take several weeks at the minimum, which could mean lawmakers don't turn their attention to tackling climate change in earnest until 2010.
Write to Siobhan Hughes at siobhan.hughes@dowjones.com and Corey Boles at corey.boles@dowjones.com